Global

‡ In these countries please contact our distributor

RI.HIP NAVIGATION

Overview

RI.HIP NAVIGATION is a Smith+Nephew proprietary technology that is part of Real Intelligence, an ecosystem that creates a seamless connection through the continuum of care by combining robotics, software and data to improve outcomes.

To realize this vision Smith+Nephew has made significant investments in technology including: Bluebelt, Atracsys and Brainlab.

RI.HIP NAVIGATION relies on over 10 years of hip navigation by Brainlab to now deliver individualized component alignment. Next to the digital measurement of leg length and offset changes, it empowers the surgeon with an assessment of individual patient pelvic tilt and a predicted view of the post-op AP X-ray in surgery thanks to its seamless integration with TraumaCad.

 

Find out more on RI.HIP NAVIGATION:

RI.HIP NAVIGATION Sales Sheet

RI.HIP NAVIGATION Lateral Position Surgical Technique

RI.HIP NAVIGATION Supine Position Surgical Technique

 

References
1. Clavé A, Fazilleau F, Cheval D, Williams T, Lefèvre C, Stindel E. Comparison of the reliability of leg length and offset data generated by three hip replacement CAOS systems using EOS™ imaging. In Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research. 2015;101:647-653.​
2. Renkawitz T, Sendtner E, Schuster T, Weber M, Grifka J, Woerner M. Femoral Pinless Length and Offset Measurements During Computer-Assisted, Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):1021–1025.​
3. Ulivi M, Orlandini L, Pascale W, Consonni O, Sansone V. Intraoperative Validation of Navigated Limb Measurements in THA Using a Pinless Femoral Array. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):1026–1029.
4. Davis ET, Schubert M, Wegner M, Haimerl M. A New Method of Registration in Navigated Hip Arthroplasty Without the Need to Register the Anterior Pelvic Plane. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:55-60.​
5. Lyu H, Wick E, Housman M, Freischlag J, Makary M. Patient satisfaction as a possible indicator of quality surgical care. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:362–367.
6. Otani K, Waterman B, Faulkner K, Boslaugh S, Burroughs T, Dunagan W. Patient satisfaction: focusing on “excellent”. J Healthc Manag. 2009;54:93–102.
7. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland: POLARSTEM cementless (Oxinium/XLPE/R3 cup) bespoke summary report. 14 August 2019. Available at: http://bit.ly/POLAR3_Aug2019
8. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland: POLARSTEM cementless (Oxinium/XLPE/R3 cup) bespoke summary report. 14 August 2019. Available at: http://bit.ly/POLAR3_Aug2019
*The references provided relate to previous versions of hip navigation which RI.HIP NAVIGATION is built on.
**Outliers are defined as cups outside the most commonly used safe zone, the Lewinnek Safe Zone. The Lewinnek Safe Zone describes an area of 40°±10° for cup inclination and 15°±10° for cup anteversion for which (Lewinnek et al. 1978) a reduced probability of postoperative dislocation was found. Hence the area is further addressed as a zone for safe cup placement in respect to dislocation. Despite concerns of its validity the Lewinnek Safe Zone is still the most commonly used safe zone for cup placement addressed in the literature.

REGIONAL RESOURCES

NAVIO Robotics System

Want more information?

Contact us button with link to contact us form